In learning and development (L&D), we can track how many modules employees complete or how quickly they master a new tool. But communication – a pivotal part of teamwork, leadership and collaboration – is more difficult to measure. We know it’s important but assessing it accurately is a difficult task.
Reading time: 5 minutes
Why communication skills matter more than ever
Organisations today are navigating constant change – economic uncertainty, digital transformation and increasingly diverse, dispersed teams. To stay agile, we need people with the right mix of skills in the right place at the right time.
That’s why many organisations are moving away from rigid role-based structures towards skills-based models and talent marketplaces. Careers are becoming more fluid, shaped by capabilities rather than job titles.
For this shift to work, organisations must identify the skills that drive success, benchmark current capabilities and invest in targeted upskilling. Although technical expertise remains valuable, our research shows that communication skills now rank higher for their impact on performance and potential.
Communication underpins everything – team alignment, leadership influence, customer trust and day-to-day productivity. Organisations need credible, user-friendly communication assessments to develop strong talent pipelines. These assessments should generate actionable insights, guide targeted development and ensure talent strategies are built on solid evidence.
Why soft skills resist simple measurement
Unlike some technical skills, communication effectiveness depends on context – who’s involved, the goal of the exchange and the cultural or emotional nuances at play. A presentation that lands perfectly with peers might miss the mark with clients.
Binary or standardised tests that focus on knowledge alone often fail to capture the subtleties of tone, empathy or non-verbal communication. They may measure what someone knows about communication principles, or how well they can follow instructions on a test, rather than how they actually communicate in real situations. In other words, it’s possible to ‘pass’ a test without demonstrating effective communication in the contexts that matter most.
So how can learning and development teams measure communication in a way that’s fair, consistent and meaningful?
Here’s four key methods – trainer assessment, self-assessment, peer feedback and online tools – which, when combined, can help your organisation turn qualitative feedback into credible, data-driven insight.
1. Trainer assessment: expertise and context
Trainers often bring professional and pedagogical experience. As such, their evaluations can carry authority, which strengthens learner confidence and organisational trust in the results.
Because trainers understand both communication competencies and real-world workplace dynamics, they can contextualise assessments. They see how skills show up in specific roles – how a sales manager negotiates, how a project lead influences stakeholders or how a customer service agent builds rapport. This allows them to tailor assessments to individual goals, needs, and challenges.
Trainers also pick up on subtleties that can make a real difference – tone, clarity, audience engagement. During coaching or learning sessions, they can transform assessments into growth opportunities, framing feedback constructively and tailoring it to each learner’s goals.
Learners often act more readily on trainer feedback because it feels both credible and personal. Trainers can also track progress over time, recognising steady improvement and providing a fuller picture of development.
The challenge? Trainer assessments do take time and may carry some risk of subjectivity. Without clear rubrics, results can vary between assessors. Still, their insight forms a critical foundation for any credible communication assessment strategy.
2. Self-assessment: building awareness and autonomy
Encouraging learners to assess their own communication skills builds ownership of their development, giving them a sense of agency and accountability. When people identify their own gaps, they’re more likely to create concrete action plans and commit to improvement.
Self-assessment supports continuous learning. It’s easy to repeat and promotes reflection – an essential ingredient for growth. Learners can benchmark their skills against specific roles or career goals, which increases the relevance and credibility of the process.
It also uncovers blind spots in day-to-day communication. Employees often notice subtle struggles – difficulty managing virtual meetings or presenting to senior leaders – that might not appear in other assessment formats.
When paired with coaching or mentoring, self-assessment data can help L&D teams target support more precisely, aligning resources to areas where learners need to improve their skills.
The challenge? Self-assessments can be distorted by overconfidence, under confidence or lack of clarity about what’s being measured. Without a structured framework or clear criteria, responses may be inconsistent or vague.
3. Peer assessment: a 360° view
360° assessment expands the lens, combining multiple perspectives to give a fuller, more balanced view of communication skills.
Feedback from colleagues, managers and peers provides insight into how communication plays out in real-world contexts – team meetings, client interactions, project updates. It highlights not only performance but also impact: how someone’s communication affects productivity and engagement.
Participants in structured learning programmes often understand the skill set being developed and can comment on current and future role requirements. The process itself strengthens collaboration, as giving and receiving feedback fosters shared accountability for development.
Assessing others also sharpens evaluators’ own awareness of effective communication, creating a culture of mutual learning.
The challenge? Maintaining honesty and consistency. Group dynamics and workplace relationships can influence feedback. Some may hesitate to offer constructive criticism, while others may apply different standards. Clear guidance and structured rubrics can help keep the process fair and productive.
4. Online and AI-enabled tools: scalability and speed
Digital platforms and AI-based tools make assessment more scalable and accessible, particularly in hybrid or global organisations.
Learners can practise anytime, anywhere, receiving immediate feedback on fluency, structure, tone or clarity. AI systems track detailed patterns and provide consistent scoring across large groups, giving organisations reliable data without overwhelming participants, managers or L&D teams.
Online tools can integrate assessment seamlessly into learning programmes, linking practice, feedback and progress tracking in one place. They also create a low-stakes, safe environment where learners can experiment, make mistakes and build confidence before applying skills in real settings.
The challenge? Automated systems may overlook emotional or cultural nuances that shape communication effectiveness. Some users remain cautious about AI fairness, bias or data security.
For these reasons, AI should complement, not replace, human evaluation. Combining digital insights with trainer and peer perspectives ensures a more rounded, trustworthy picture.
Blending perspectives for credible insight
No single assessment method can capture the full spectrum of communication skills. The most reliable results come from triangulation – combining at least two, ideally three, approaches to balance strengths and mitigate weaknesses.
For high-stakes or leadership development programmes where communication is critical, using all four methods – trainer, self, 360° and digital – provides the most credible insights. This multi-angled view requires careful coordination and clear rubrics to maintain consistency and avoid overload.
Standardised criteria are essential. They reduce subjectivity, making it easier to compare results across formats and ensure fairness. Transparency also matters. Learners should understand how assessments work and how results will be used. When people trust the process, they’re more open to feedback and more motivated to improve.
Finally, keep the focus on development, not grading. Assessments should feel like a tool for growth, not a pass or fail test. Communication skills evolve with context, practice and feedback, so assessments should too.
Turning soft skills into strategic strengths
Perfect objectivity might be out of reach, but that’s not the goal. The aim is credible, balanced insight; a clear, evidence-based understanding of where strengths lie and where growth is needed.
By blending trainer expertise, self-reflection, 360° perspectives and digital data, learning and development teams can measure the ‘hard-to-measure’ and turn soft skills into a strategic advantage.
British Council has 90 years’ experience of partnering with organisations and individuals in over 200 countries to help them make confident people decisions through trusted English language assessment.
Our testing and assessment solutions support every stage of workforce development, from recruitment and progression to training evaluation and certification. Whether you need to identify the right talent, measure learning impact or benchmark English proficiency, our tools are designed to give you reliable and actionable insight.
Explore our assessment solutions or book a free consultation with our team to discuss your goals.